Police body-worn camera access nationwide

Endnotes

[1] AZ, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, LA, MD, MN, NB, NV, NH, NC, ND, OK, OR, RI, SC, TX, UT, VT, and WA.

[2] AL, AK, AR, DE, ID, KY, ME, NM, SD, WV, WS, and WY.

[3] KY.

[4] CA, HI, IA, MA, MI, MO, NJ, NY, OH, PA, and TN.

[5] KS, MS, MT, and VA.

[6] AZ, FL, NB, NV, NC, and WA.

[7] CA, CT, LA, MD, NV, NC, SC, and VA.

[8] MD, NV, NC, and RI.

[9] GA, IL, IN, MN, NB, NH, OR, SC, TX, and WA.

[10] IL, IN, LA, MN, NH, NC, OR, RI, and SC.

[11] MO, NV, NJ, and NY.

[12] GA, NV, OK, TX, UT, and WA.

[13] For example, North Carolina explicitly covers “a visual, audio, or visual and audio recording captured by a . . . dashboard camera” under its restrictive new law, whereas Illinois explicitly indicates that dashboard camera videos “shall be available under the applicable provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.”

[14] Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle.

[15] Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix Los Angeles, Miami, New York, San Diego.

[16] Atlanta, San Francisco.

Pages