Blog

$100k grant to Peaceoholics had no performance measures tied to contract

Documents released through the DC Freedom of Information Act show that no performance measures were detailed in a contract between the Fenty administration and the Peaceoholics, which received $100,000 grant to run a program intended to keep kids out of trouble in 2008. Measures were provided by Fenty's office to the police department, but did not make it into the contract between the District and the non-profit group that works with at-risk youths, the documents reqeusted by The Washington Examiner show.

Protestors Make Way Into Closed-Door Council Breakfast Meeting

A group protesting budget cuts to the District's social services programs pushed their way past security guards outside of the D.C.

Lead in the Water Whistleblower Had FOIA Battle with District

An environmental engineering professor at Virginia Tech waged a years-long crusade to determine the validity of reports issued by the CDC that downplayed the incidence and effects of lead in the District's drinking water.  At a hearing last week, the House Science Committee's Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Staff vindicated that crusade, confirming Professor Marc Edwards' conclusions that the CDC's reports were flawed.  Edwards' investigation had included a drawn-out and expensive dispute about access to District documents containing data on lead in the water; the report produced for the subcommittee includes Edwards' description

Post Editorial Supports Open Meetings Reform

The Washington Post editorial board has issued a call for a reform of the open meetings law in the District.  The editorial notes that the opening of the Council's budget discussions last week to a television camera was a step in the right direction, but that such accessibility should not be subject to the whim of the Council chair.  Washington Post

Nickles Looking into Opening Juvenile Records

Following the revelations this week that the teen suspects in the murder of principal Brian Betts have lengthy rap sheets and were in and out of supervision by the District's Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services, Attorney General Peter Nickles has vowed to look into the policies requiring confidentiality of juvenile records.  As Harry Jaffe reports in his column for the Examiner, Nickles says, "These records should be made available to the public . . . I would trust the media and the people to interpret the information. We're looking at how to open up the records."

Exoneration Leads to Call for More Openness in Juv. Justice

The Washington Post editorial board used the occasion of the exoneration of one suspect in last month's quadruple slayings in Southeast Washington to highlight the problems caused by excessive confidentiality regarding youth offender programs in the District.  While noting that the initial charges against the suspect drew a great deal of attention to problems faced by the city's juvenile justice system, the editorial observed that even with the dropping of the charges, problems remain:

Whither CapStat?

Loose Lips Weekly leads off this week with an item tracking down the reason that the District stopped posting documents and video from the Mayor's CapStat agency performance oversight meetings, as it had previously done.  The conclusion: Attorney General Peter Nickles describes the materials related to CapStat sessions as the essence of "deliberative process," a privilege exempting internal agency working materials under the District's open records law.  Loose Lips then surveys some other transparency problems that have cropped up during this administration.  Washington City Paper

New Bills Would Increase Transparency

A bill sponsored by Councilmember Michael Brown would require that the chief financial officer conduct a study of the impact of any proposed tax abatement or exemption when city officials are seeking to lure a business to the District. The proposal would allow for more rigorous and public examination of the costs and benefits of using such means to bring businesses to D.C.  The Washington Post editorial board is in favor, as is the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute. Washington Post

Blog Post Explains Zoning Process

The Greater Greater Washington blog has included a detailed description of the public bodies and processes that govern zoning in the District of Columbia.  The system has some complexity, and this description is helpful when seeking to understand an issue like the one that recently arose in the 14th & U St. neighborhood, where zoning officials have declared that no new restaurant or bar applications will be approved as a result of a zoning restriction that has just been triggered.  Greater Greater Washington

Budget Document Delay Prompts Rebuke

As of Thursday afternoon, April 8th, a key part of the mayor's budget proposal package had not yet been made available to the D.C. Council or the public, spurring Council Chairman Vincent Gray to send a letter to Mayor Fenty.  The entire budget proposal is required by law to be submitted by April 1st, which starts the Congressionally allocated 56-day review period for Council review and approval.  Missing from the Mayor's budget submission so far is the Budget Support Act, a key document that explains the changes in fees, taxes, and legislative initiatives that support the budget.  Chairman Gray's letter notes that this is "an issue of basic government transparency," and that the document contains $100 million in taxes and fee increases that need to be made available for Council and public examination.  District Wire, Washington City Paper

Syndicate content